Along with the rule is not the mainstream of traditional Chinese medicine

Zhang Yingdong Shanxi college of traditional Chinese medicine combine traditional Chinese and western medicine hospital

China's traditional Chinese medicine to

        The history of the modern meaning "card" less than 60 years. Initially proposed the "card", to emphasize "characteristics" and "advantage" in TCM, is a kind of rules or conventions.

        "Rule" with disease only for big principle of less than, need to be flexible processing "bad disease" symptomatic treatment, it can not be artificially high, become a "total differentiation all disease method". So, "with the disease of cure" is for "bad" emergency symptomatic treatment, not mainstream treatise on febrile disease.

        Concept of "the disease of arteries and veins, know what inverse, along with the rule." This is zhang zhongjing created for later generations of cure "disease" bad therapeutic principle (note: the current lot of books, the "disorder" to "pass" in the sentence. The difference between the two see later). And nowadays is very popular there is also a trend, which seriously disease corresponds to "party" and "the corresponding", etc., concern over the formulas concern for people with the disease.

        Direct impact of the ideological trend, is the "rule" with disease, the syndrome with party is now a lot of students of traditional Chinese medicine, Chinese medicine scholars even mistaken for a doctor of traditional Chinese medicine treatment based on "total approach to all disease", but this is for traditional Chinese medicine "disease was found in the machine", "see disease known source", "cure" the distortion and misunderstanding of mainstream and the correct thinking needs to be alert.

        Is disease of "conquer" rather than "in the rule"

        To understand the ancients first original text

        Raise out during the author thinks that, in the process of "rule" with disease, there is a bridge, syndrome differentiation and play an important role. Many scholars presuppose that the axiom of status of syndrome differentiation and treatment, and then to find theoretical basis in the treatise on febrile disease, and the "rule" with disease was selected, and name it "conquer".

        If no status of axiom of treatment based on syndrome differentiation, the misunderstanding of "in the rule" it could be corrected. If the nature of the ancients did not, the generalisation of the concept of "syndrome", we should restore the ancient original meaning of the text. Only restore the ancients the key words in the article, we can be more accurate understanding of the ancients to express meaning.

        Some scholars think, the problem of words, need not too serious, as long as in today's major consensus that when discussing each other can understand each other in what to say.

        Problem is the doctor of traditional Chinese medicine has always been emphasized "reading classics", reading the first thing to do is to read the classics, if the words of ancient and modern changes affect the understanding of the original, you need to pay more attention. We'll be the first to focus on communication between is not present, but with the communication between the ancients. "The analects of Confucius, zi lu" yue: "rectification will also name... name... the gentleman in him will be destroyed, if not all." Therefore, on the issue of the "certificate" "name", can not be ignored.

        And the certificate of origin

        "Chinese big dictionary" interpretation of the "disease" yue: "sick elephants. Sometimes refers to diseases. Also as a 'pass'." For "certificate", "certificate", "certificate" explanation is: "after the license conditions. As a 'disease'." "Card, with the 'card'." "Certificate, the certificate of the Chinese." Result: the ancient "card" modern "disorder", no substantial difference. That is to say, see "certificate" in the ancient books, can be directly instead to "disorder". In so doing, the more conducive to understand the ancient medical books.

        The concept of modern meaning "card", how long history? "Certificate" and "syndrome" has a clear distinction, from when to start?

        The history of the modern meaning "card" less than 60 years. Initially proposed the "card", to emphasize "characteristics" and "advantage" in TCM, is a kind of rules or conventions, "not only contradict with the inherent characteristics and the concept of traditional Chinese medicine, and violated the rule of linguistics."

        Originated in introduces the syndrome, Parkinson's, after finalize the design in the 1950 s. Talk about the "card" with a specific significance concept, we should understand a premise: currently used, the established "disciplines" of the basic theory of TCM, is the medical profession for the communication between Chinese and western in modern, adapt to the trend of The Times, west of medicine as the frame of reference, under the background of "science", the traditional Chinese medicine shall be separately prescribed some intrinsic content in the product. The concept of "syndrome" is one of them.

        By shandong university of traditional Chinese medicine Zhang Xiaoxia regression of traditional Chinese medicine, to understanding of the basic theory of TCM, the author believes that the "card" as a fixed concept, is in after the founding of new China, "as" the second edition of TCM college textbook compilation, and speculated that this was done to "visually make the basic theory of TCM" dialectical materialism "color."

        At present, how to evaluate the historical merits of differentiation need another matter, we can go directly to do, is reading books when see "certificate", can be directly instead to "disorder". "In the rule" since appeared in the treatise on febrile disease, to form a "rule" with disease directly, when there is no objection.

Unfinished, full text links:http://www.cntcmvideo.com/zgzyyb/html/2013-06/05/content_73965.htm