About the author: Liu Qun, this is an astronomer, when he stepped into the field of medicine, but scientific studies in humans have experience and insights, this is the result of interdisciplinary. This Qian proposed "pre-scientific" concept and "from qualitative to quantitative comprehensive integrated method" coincide, also in line with money old "human machine is" thinking. That is when the "machine" (ie, equipment, etc.) when not enough medical achievements, even to when the "machine" is enough when medical achievements, "person" must be "man-machine system" subject. 

  

  

  

  

 Future development of Medical direction 

 

- Qian left to us? 

  

  

 

     Truly a distinguished scientist and founder of China's space industry - Qian left us forever, but his spirit will always remain in the scientific world. Qian left to us? Left support and encourage the exploration of a scientific approach and innovation! And he proposed a system of scientific ideology, especially thinking the direction of science and human science scholarship, more human future pointing out the direction of medicine.

    The height of the medical money old stand, the whole heart medicine, concern for the development of human medicine, when in comes to medicine, pointed out that "the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine is a whole, look at the issue from the system." Found that the theory of money old system of medicine is a holistic approach, the strengths is its holistic view, multi-level concept. We believe that the money old is not just a recognition of Chinese medicine, with money old and his broad-minded attitude of seeking truth from facts in science, he is worried about the medicine, Chinese medicine and Western medicine does not matter, no matter what the medical system should be whole and direction to develop, this is his intention. Money old view that the scientific concept of development in medicine, a concrete embodiment.

    Chinese President Hu Jintao also proposed to develop we must adhere to the "scientific development", what is the scientific concept of development? Personally think that the scientific concept of development to emphasize that scientific thinking and rational thinking. To the scientific development concept, we must first understand what science is, how can we talk about the development of the other.

       First, what is science

    "Science" What is the meaning of the word? We all have to do very well? When I asked a few scholars and experts, usually when the answer is: Science must go through a certain form, or we found the so-called "scientific" process. With indicators, with data, with quantitative conclusions can be identified as science. I have different views on this, I think that should not have such a narrow definition of science, science is to reveal the true significance of the nature of things, does not depend on what forms of take, including those identified by us in the form of doubt . Otherwise, our thoughts and ideas would lead to rigid, we are talking about science, perhaps in the know have already departed from the scientific track, into the scientific errors. Such as the overall concept and system of the current instruments can not quantify it, but it is a scientific conclusion. Another example is a can not be identified by the previous reversal of science can not overcome a difficult disease, when using conventional testing procedures and after treatment, yet the disease is cured, it already has from the results on the inner science, perhaps Its scientific principles with existing instruments can not reveal it yet, are we to deny it to the scientific nature of it? To quantify, the current testing equipment is more microscopic detection, we are confined to the microscopic understanding of the macro will not forget the link? According to the principles of physics, any receivers are selective and limited, as we did before the conclusion of each diagnosis is not clear considering all the limitations of current instruments it? Because of the limitations of current instruments are of this nature have, when we get the results after testing the instrument, but also taking into account other factors associated with the disease, or instruments can not reveal those instruments can not detect the reasons There are blind because of equipment, so the analysis can not add directly to those data as a diagnostic indicator of the conclusion, or to quantify it will go rigid. I think that any disease will not occur in isolation, so we can not be viewed in isolation of a disease a disease, but can not point to cover up, the whole system from the dynamic focus, so as to make a scientific diagnosis, thus revealing the truth about the disease . On medical diagnoses, the differential diagnosis of the conclusions of a scientific nature, the key depends on whether it could reveal the nature of the disease.

         Second, the testing standards of science

    Practice is the sole criterion for testing truth, medical science must go through clinical testing, then the examiner who is it? The patient was well-deserved examiners.

    For medical research purposes, I think we should stay in the more scientific Western medicine which in the end the endless debate on the Ye Hao Chinese medicine, Western medicine worth mentioning, no matter how good his medical theory, once divorced from reality, but also can not be patient acceptable. The reason of today's medicine, not the need to talk to gorgeous professional terminology, but through research to identify new found difficult to address and reduce disease, to protect human health, and if our research can not solve the real treatment issues, meaning how in it? Cells were not a focus, what genes, patients pay more attention to - whether medical workers cured of their disease. So what theory is not important, the key to look at efficacy, efficacy is the last word. Has the effect on the scientific, does not have effect on the loss of science, which is also in line of philosophy. Even if the mechanism of the scientific method also used the existing test can not be confirmed a moment, but we did not have reason to deny its scientific nature. Instead, we should also actively seek to study it, explore it, with a pragmatic approach to verify it. Only this way can the human body according to the normal track of development of science, medicine to progress.

        Third, on the development of vision

    Of medicine, we should pay attention to heritage, but also attach importance to innovation and development; just blindly accept the neglect of development, and medical will lose vitality. Talked about the development of medicine, we need to understand several aspects of the problem. 

    Space for the development of human science, where?

    Development direction and approach what is it?

    Anything were to develop, but also in medical research without losing the vision of development. I try to hypertension as an example to explain the vision of development. Hypertension is the medical profession has always been regarded as the restricted area can not be overcome, the whole world that the blood pressure "can not cure, only medication for life", this conclusion has been doctors and patients about the mentality of modern medicine can not cure all that hypertension is established scientific conclusions. Whether this conclusion is not a scientific conclusion? As we all know, today's understanding of the human body is not enough, the development of human medicine has not yet to the top. So we are under the blood pressure "medication only for life, can not overcome," the conclusion is certainly not a scientific conclusion, I think that "everything possible, everything is possible", perhaps after the conversion will produce a breakthrough idea. This reason, in my capture of hypertension has been validated. Today not only hypertension medicine to make "the only medication for life, unable to overcome the" conclusion, addition there are many other diseases have also been made "irreversible, incurable," the conclusion, are these conclusions Science? These conclusions have also been considered, or scientific procedures and monitoring of, or after a significant statistics, and use of statistical theory, is a quantifiable indicators to be scientific, but not on that definition it is a scientific conclusion. This conclusion should at least lose the constant development of the medical perspective. Understanding of the human body as the human understanding of the universe, as always continue to reveal new layers of the veil, that is impossible today, and perhaps in humans, the discovery of a new tomorrow, it will become possible. Knew, the person's knowledge is always presented as progressive and stage, both Chinese and Western medicine, today's knowledge can only be a stage of awareness. Or a certain stage has been recognized. However, when a new understanding came out, lot of resistance is always difficult to be accepted at once, due to old concepts and habits of thinking, people are imprisoned always consciously or unconsciously, the maintenance of the old knowledge. Things, the law often is the case, when using the old standards as the new cognitive awareness, new understanding is always wrong. From a development point of view, perhaps we can see today in some medical research or some flawed "scientific" conclusion of the scientific nature, but human beings and then step forward, maybe you will see Today's flaws, just as heliocentric geocentric denied the same. Therefore, we have contains all of the mind, allowing people with new thinking, tolerance of others unknown to the scientific exploration of human spirit, which is that today we work in medical research should hold the attitude.

        Fourth, innovation is an inexhaustible motive force development of medicine

    Innovation is the soul of human progress, is an inexhaustible motive force medical development. On the current medical advances, although the more developed science, diagnosis and treatment of various medical equipment has become increasingly advanced, but human disease is still not free from difficult problems, there are not many medical mystery opened, indicating that human understanding of the human body is not enough. Development of medical science have not reached the top, we watch the horizon of the human body there are still unknown, or there is the blind instrument can not detect, precisely because of these many confusing and unknown to our medical research to provide a wider space for development.

    Current medical research and medical development status, from the appearance of view, we think that the development of medicine today is not slow, the development of medical instruments such as the total in the guise of modern medicine is constantly building stands, but in the hardware inputs Meanwhile, we follow up the medical concept of whether it? I think that the development of medicine is not limited to hardware development, but also the major conceptual advances in medicine, which is the key to medical advances.

     Let us ponder such a question, at present a variety of medical devices have been very advanced, microscopic detection of human and almost exhausted, but failed to make such a subtle understanding of human beings to find out the cause of many diseases, the problem Where? I think that the microscopic observation is necessary, but if we only lost the cognitive micro-macro linkages, no matter how advanced the food, it is hard to find see the origin of the disease. In people's minds, the instrument has become the spokesman for the authority of conclusion, the instrument has people into a micro-perspective or "dead", more advanced equipment, the more people rely on the face of confusion people have the courage to question, in people's eyes, all scientific procedures, all scientific conclusions, no longer a new way of thinking, let the instrument conclusions mercy. For microscopic detection, the instrument really helped us a lot, however, that any disease will not occur in isolation, even if a cell changes, it will not be isolated, we can not cling to the microscopic understanding, we must Overall, the system focus, which is well-known scientist Qian concern. We want to promote innovation, to break the rules, and doctors have the law, but it is not fixed, odd diseases have odd rule, very ill, the law must be used very much. We want to create a correct perception of view, the courage to escape from the old concept out on the human body to explore the unknown areas of persistent, thus opening a new veil of the human body. When we confined to a medical research when, if there are many difficult diseases can not be captured from beginning to end, according to this approach and thinking of going again end without result, should not we be from other disciplines to find way out? For example, physics, and I observed in the clinical, the body can follow the movement of the motion law of physics. Therefore, we need cross-scientific research in medicine, natural sciences should be integrated into the concept, from a new perspective on the human body a new observation, in humans, there may be new discoveries, new findings bring influence disease new interpretation, the so-called "incurable" may become treatable, in clinical medicine, we also made a major breakthrough in human medicine, there would be taken from this new step, which is the whole of mankind expect.

        V. Qian system from clinical practice confirms the importance of and the overall concept 

    Clinical practice is the only proven medical breakthroughs.

    Currently, the field of medical research the various strange phenomenon, worthy of our new ideas. In accordance with the habits of thinking, all the test instruments, including quantitative indicators and a variety of medical images can be identified as a scientific conclusion. However, we are not a forgotten issue can not be ignored: all the testing instruments are micro-and local, in the science behind the conclusion is not already lost money old said, "Open Complex Giant System" at the macro level everything.

     As we wanted to study the sea, yet the sea is only a drop of water extraction; Again, we want to study the causes of tides, but do not know the existence of the moon. In our medical research, similar to this situation is not also frequent it? This study is not a departure from the original intention of our study? We will not leave the truth to be revealed more distant disease, it?

    Today's medicine, there are diseases which lack a scientific explanation? Even those who currently difficult disease of unknown cause is not lack of "scientific" explanation.

    This conclusion is it?

     Medicine today is not lack of explanation is the lack of efficacy. Medicine to develop the theory and practice must be out of line to get rid of the situation. 

    Take the case of bone, usually the doctors preferred the bone X-ray problem, we all know, "Bone led by tendons, broken bones scattered ribs," ribs on the bone with the force can not be ignored, but X-rays can only illuminate whether ectopic bone, but does not reflect changes in muscle in vivo.

    I have found in clinical, many bones and tendons involved issues related to gluten, if we ignore the factors governing bone bent often not wasted, not only so that patients can not be cured, if taken wrong if the treatment, or be easily the procedure, the result may be counterproductive, and even treatment of this injury he.

    My view of the new medical, practice in the medical press, by the test of time and time again.

    Here, give an example. One-year-old child was diagnosed with cervical dislocation, neck and right skew, neck traction in hospital 40 days not yet effective, the hospital by the consultation, the proposed Interception of a piece of bone from the thigh implanted vertebrae in order to effect the cervical spine is curved, the parents carefully considerations, some fear, did not agree and, after the patient referred to my hands. I hand-to-child changes in bone in vivo, from the bone, and to consider the interaction of muscle and bone changes produced, and even touch the whole person, with the unexpected discovery: the original child tilt the neck to the right, because the torsion bar , led to the cervical spine caused by the dark, this is not the normal pull force, the cervical spine to the right tilt. This is the real cause. But this reason the detection of X-ray imaging can not.

    I use acupuncture tools, directly down to the problem of the place, with a pin to straighten out its torsion bars to make it back to normal, or about a no surgery surgery. Is a complete treatment.

    Shun is through the allocation of chaos, a miracle occurs immediately, the children not only eliminates the pain of surgery, the cervical problems solved. Family members of patients with an unexpected surprise.

    From such clinical practice, further confirms the view of Qian system theory and the importance of the whole.

    Looking to the future development of medical science, human science research long way to go.

    On the direction and the way the development of medicine, Qian master vision, he emphasized systems theory, has been for our exploration and research in the human body, medicine and ways of development indicated on the right path and direction

    Although Mr. Qian Xuesen generation master left us, but his ideas, his character, always guide us in medical research continue to explore the road ahead on a lamp, vision for the future, I am confident to see the future will be more bright! The future development of medical research in this direction, will usher in the spring of Medicine flourish!